Five Ways Nonprofits Can Navigate Uncertainty Amid New Political Policy Changes

Challenges Within the Nonprofit Sector During a New Presidential Administration’s Policy Changes – 2025 Update

In times of political upheaval and economic uncertainty, nonprofits are under more pressure than ever to continue to operate, and in many cases, to do more with less. One month into power, the Trump Administration has taken several steps to shrink the federal bureaucracy. An early executive order paused new hires and placed many federal workers on leave.¹ Other policy changes have had an impact on foreign aid organizations, and those working on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.²

Additionally, the administration has granted sweeping powers to the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), with the goal of scrutinizing agencies and cutting budgets.³ And while many of the new administration’s initiatives have been challenged by the courts, nonprofits that rely on government partnerships will continue to face uncertainty as these policy changes take shape over the coming months.

Faced with these challenges, the natural reaction of the nonprofit sector is to tighten their budgets and find ways to cut costs. Certainly, this isn’t the right time to make new investments … or is it? Omatic’s Stu Manewith, a former nonprofit finance director, describes the tension many organizations feel:

It’s a really challenging environment for nonprofits right now. Economic and political uncertainty compels organizations to cut back on ‘unnecessary’ spending and pause initiatives that require new investments. However, organizations often need these investments to be more efficient and effective. There’s a very real danger for an organization to operate according to the status quo, while the world around them is changing. Organizations need to consider investments that will help them gain efficiencies and strategically approach supporters, as meaningfully connecting with supporters is even more important during times of major political changes.

So, how should your organization adapt to the changing funding landscape? Focus on the fundraising operations that are in your control. Take the time to take stock of existing tools, leverage technology, and get more out of your greatest asset—data. Keep reading for five essential steps to position your organization for success in times of uncertainty.

1. Take stock of current processes.

What systems do you have in place to support your fundraising and supporter engagement efforts? In addition to their main CRM, most organizations have four or more applications that support activities such as email marketing, event management, online giving, peer-to-peer fundraising, and volunteer management. Unfortunately, these systems don’t always “talk” to each other, which can lead to substantial inefficiencies for your organization. Here are a few questions to ask as you consider opportunities to streamline your systems and processes:

• How much time does your organization spend each week on manual work, including data entry, review, and clean-up? Are there other areas where this time could be more strategically spent?
• How quickly are you able to acknowledge gifts? Are gift acknowledgments personalized according to a donor’s previous support?
• Can you keep up with gift entry and gift acknowledgment after a major event or campaign?
• Does your development team have a single source of truth for supporter information?

2. Identify gaps in your data.

Building on the questions above, is there any data you don’t capture because your organization simply doesn’t have the capacity to do so? For example, when you receive files containing donor information from corporate/matching gift programs, do you record the donor data in your CRM? What about volunteer hours, or documentation that an annual report was requested and sent to a supporter’s home address?

These are examples of data that is often overlooked because of the time-consuming nature of integrating or importing it into an organization’s CRM. However, all these data points represent meaningful engagements with a supporter – and relationships that could be cultivated into long-term support. As you evaluate your current data for gaps, keep these tips in mind:

• Talk to stakeholders across the organization to make sure you have a comprehensive understanding of data needs
• It’s not just about data that’s missing. If your team doesn’t trust the data that exists, you might as well not have it. It’s important to understand what data your team feels confident using – and what data it believes to be prone to errors

3. Invest in an ecosystem, not individual solutions.

As highlighted above, most organizations leverage four or more applications, in addition to their main CRM, to power their fundraising and supporter engagement efforts. These applications are often chosen for their best-in-class functionality, rather than their ability to integrate with each other. Unfortunately, when applications are implemented in silos, organizations lose the ability to achieve a complete picture of supporter activity.

Imagine having to go to one system to view a supporter’s engagement with your organization’s events, another to find donation data, yet use a completely different system for volunteer information. In addition to being frustrating and time-consuming for your development team, this process can lead to a poor supporter experience. Evidence of this frustration, Salesforce.org’s Nonprofit Trends Report recently revealed that only 34% of nonprofit professionals are very satisfied with their organization’s integration of data sources and systems.

By investing in intelligent data integration tools, organizations can combat the silos created by disparate systems and create a technology ecosystem in which all their data systems are talking to and updating each other. When resources are limited, this also allows organizations to realize the full value of their technology investment and achieve more with existing systems they currently have.

4. Leverage data to make more strategic decisions.

When data is consolidated across all systems to create a complete view of supporter activity, organizations can more easily analyze that data to make decisions about where to spend valuable resources. Organizations are increasingly being asked to do more with less, so it’s critical for teams to leverage data appropriately to determine exactly how their efforts can yield results and deliver a higher return on investment.

Here are a few examples of questions organizations should evaluate quarterly or yearly to drive future planning:

• What methods of donor acquisition were most effective?
• What campaigns/activities had the greatest return on investment?
• What segments of your supporters were most likely to make major gifts?
• What supporters lapsed – and what strategies are most effective to re-engage them?

By answering these questions, teams can prioritize efforts that have historically performed best to drive the most engagement going forward. Again, the most effective answers to these questions will largely depend on how comprehensive and complete your supporter data is.

5. Engage supporters with the right message, at the right time, through the right channel.

With integrated data, organizations can better communicate to current and future supporters for more effective acquisition, retention, and long-term support. Let’s consider a nonprofit embarking on a capital campaign. How would supporters respond differently to the following scenarios?

Scenario 1

• Situation: An organization is using multiple, disparate systems to manage communications and donations. The organization initiates a campaign with social media promotion and a mass email to its database. The organization knows some of its donors prefer to mail checks, so it also plans to send a large mailing a few weeks later. As it prepares the mailing, the organization notices it has duplicate records for many supporters – for some, it has the same name, but different addresses. For others, one address has several names associated with it (Jane Donor vs. Jane Supporter or Jon Supporter vs. Jonathan Supporter).
• Result: The organization cannot easily determine which names and contact information are correct, thereby increasing the risk of potentially upsetting supporters with incorrect information. In addition, because its online giving platform isn’t integrated with its main CRM, the organization is unable to identify and remove people who respond to the initial email outreach from the mailed campaign, potentially frustrating supporters with continued outreach after a donation was made.

Scenario 2

• Situation: Leveraging a solution like Omatic Cloud, an organization has created an integrated technology ecosystem, with all data sources reflected in its main CRM. From the CRM, the organization pulls several reports to segment and personalize outreach for the capital campaign.

• Result: The organization can effectively segment their supporter base, sending mailed outreach to donors who have traditionally made gifts via check and email outreach with customized messaging to donors who have previously given online. The organization’s development team can also quickly identify and personally call donors who have given a total of $500 or more over the past year, or who have engaged with the organization through three or more activities. Lastly, the organization will be able to send a personalized email to volunteers and event attendees who have given time but never made a donation, thanking them for their support and highlighting how funds will help the organization further its mission.

In the second scenario, supporters are engaged through the methods they prefer, in a way that shows appreciation for their past support. Today’s consumers expect this type of communication; however, it can only be achieved with consolidated data. This is particularly important in times of political uncertainty when donors are likely to spend more cautiously.

Learn More

Much like their supporters, nonprofit organizations understandably tend to buckle down on spending during times of uncertainty, when making new investments can be seen as risky. But the greatest risk actually lies in not investing in the areas that will drive success amid the uncertain times – areas that allow you to maximize the ROI of your technology ecosystem, inform strategic decisions, and communicate effectively with supporters.

If you’re interested in talking with one of our nonprofit data integration technology experts to learn more about streamlining your systems and processes and eliminating gaps in your data, simply fill out demo form below, or sign-up for an upcoming webinar.

¹ “How Trump’s Executive Orders Are Impacting Nonprofits” | Nixon Peabody LLP 
² “Here Is What to Know About U.S. Foreign Aid and the Trump Freeze” | New York Times
³ “Inside Elon Musk’s Plan for DOGE to Slash Government Costs” | New York Times